Authors: Alex Fabbri*, Wojciech Kryściński*, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Dragomir Radev
This project is a collaboration work between Yale LILY Lab and Salesforce Research.
* - Equal contributions from authors
04/19/2020 - Updated the human annotation file to include all models from paper and metric scores.
04/19/2020 - SummEval is now pip-installable! Check out the pypi page.
04/09/2020 - Please see this comment with code for computing system-level metric correlations!
11/12/2020 - Added the reference-less BLANC and SUPERT metrics!
7/16/2020 - Initial commit! :)
As part of this release, we share summaries generated by recent summarization model trained on the CNN/DailyMail dataset here.
We also share human annotations, collected from both crowdsource workers and experts here.
Both datasets are shared WITHOUT the source articles that were used to generate the summaries.
To recreate the full dataset please follow the instructions listed here.
IMPORTANT:
All model outputs were obtained from the original authors of the models and shared with their consent.
When using any of the model outputs, please also cite the original paper.
Human annotations of model generated summaries can be found here.
The annotations include summaries generated by 16 models from 100 source news articles (1600 examples in total).
Each of the summaries was annotated by 5 indepedent crowdsource workers and 3 independent experts (8 annotations in total).
Summaries were evaluated across 4 dimensions: coherence, consistency, fluency, relevance.
Each source news article comes with the original reference from the CNN/DailyMail dataset and 10 additional crowdsources reference summaries.
Both model generated outputs and human annotated data require pairing with the original CNN/DailyMail articles.
To recreate the datasets follow the instructions:
- Download CNN Stories and Daily Mail Stories from https://cs.nyu.edu/~kcho/DMQA/
- Create a
cnndmdirectory and unpack downloaded files into the directory - Download and unpack model outputs or human annotations.
- Run the
pair_data.pyscript to pair the data with original articles
Example call for model outputs:
python3 data_processing/pair_data.py --model_outputs <file-with-data-annotations> --story_files <dir-with-stories>
Example call for human annotations:
python3 data_processing/pair_data.py --data_annotations <file-with-data-annotations> --story_files <dir-with-stories>
We provide a toolkit for summarization evaluation to unify metrics and promote robust comparison of summarization systems. The toolkit contains popular and recent metrics for summarization as well as several machine translation metrics.
Below are the metrics included in the tookit, followed by the associated paper and code used within the toolkit:
You can install summ_eval via pip:
pip install summ-evalYou can also install summ_eval from source:
git clone https://github.com/Yale-LILY/SummEval.git
cd evaluation
pip install -e .
You can test your installation (assuming you're in the ./summ_eval folder) and get familiar with the library through tests/
python -m unittest discover
We provide a command-line interface calc-scores which makes use of gin config files to set metric parameters.
Run ROUGE on given source and target files and write to rouge.jsonl, analogous to files2rouge.
calc-scores --config-file=examples/basic.config --metrics "rouge" --summ-file summ_eval/1.summ --ref-file summ_eval/1.ref --output-file rouge.jsonl --eos " . " --aggregate True
NOTE: if you're seeing slow-ish startup time, try commenting out the metrics you're not using in the config; otherwise this will load all modules.
Run ROUGE and BertScore on a .jsonl file which contains reference and decoded (i.e., system output) keys and write to output.jsonl.
calc-scores --config-file=examples/basic.config --metrics "rouge, bert_score" --jsonl-file data.jsonl --output-file rouge_bertscore.jsonl
For a full list of options, please run:
calc-scores --help
If you want to use the evaluation metrics as part of other scripts, we have you covered!
from summ_eval.rouge_metric import RougeMetric
rouge = RougeMetric()
summaries = ["This is one summary", "This is another summary"]
references = ["This is one reference", "This is another"]
rouge_dict = rouge.evaluate_batch(summaries, references)
rouge_dict = rouge.evaluate_example(summaries[0], references[0])
Currently the command-line tool does not use multiple references for simplicity. Each metric has a supports_multi_ref property to tell you if it supports multiple references.
print(rouge.supports_multi_ref) # True
multi_references = [["This is ref 1 for summ 1", "This is ref 2 for summ 1"], ["This is ref 1 for summ 2", "This is ref 2 for summ 2"]]
rouge_dict = rouge.evaluate_batch(summaries, multi_references)
@article{fabbri2020summeval,
title={SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation},
author={Fabbri, Alexander R and Kry{\'s}ci{\'n}ski, Wojciech and McCann, Bryan and Xiong, Caiming and Socher, Richard and Radev, Dragomir},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12626},
year={2020}
}
Please create a GitHub issue if you have any questions, suggestions, requests or bug-reports. We welcome PRs!