Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

peer review: <Parisha Nizam Team 22> - Missing Formal Specification #110

Open
Tracked by #66
parishanizam opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #66
Labels
peer review To be used with different parties for review purposes

Comments

@parishanizam
Copy link

artifact under review.

SRS Document

team number (for the team doing the review).

Team 22

description of issue.

The document is missing formal specification of any kind in the documentation. For tinymorph, writting the specification as a finaite state machine might be more appropriate, but important to do to get a good understanding of logic flow and explain the different states of the system. Formal specification will help to ensure well defined requriements to follow for the system and should be done before moving on to any future project development.

@CSchank

@parishanizam parishanizam added the peer review To be used with different parties for review purposes label Oct 15, 2024
@aarnphm
Copy link
Owner

aarnphm commented Oct 16, 2024

I don't think formal specification applies within the volere template. wouldn't Business Data Model suffic for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
peer review To be used with different parties for review purposes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants