From 62803e3f33e7637b33b78e808ec1f434cf46aaee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: austin <101911867+abarton51@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 21:41:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update final_report.md

---
 tabs/final_report.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tabs/final_report.md b/tabs/final_report.md
index f3ac98b..ce220c9 100644
--- a/tabs/final_report.md
+++ b/tabs/final_report.md
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ We performed a search over the best value of the cost complexity pruning penalty
 
 <img src="../assets/dt_cc_path.png" alt="drawing" width="300"/>
 
-However, this does not mean the model is performing worse as the cost complexity penalty increases. As shown below, there is an optimal cost complexity penality found at around ~0.09 that results in the best test accuracy of the model. This is the cost complexity penalty we use for our decision tree.
+However, this does not mean the model is performing worse as the cost complexity penalty increases. As shown below, there is an optimal cost complexity penality found at around ~0.02 that results in the best test accuracy of the model. This is the cost complexity penalty we use for our decision tree.
 
 <img src="../assets/cc_accuracy_path.png" alt="drawing" width="300"/>