139-139: Verify handling of ARTHTTPPaginatedResult items

The documentation addition is clear and aligns with the PR's objective of improving JSON handling. Let's verify that the implementation correctly handles all possible item types from ARTHTTPPaginatedResult.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for ARTHTTPPaginatedResult usage to verify item types
# Expected: Find all places where ARTHTTPPaginatedResult items are converted to JSONValue

# Search for ARTHTTPPaginatedResult usage
rg -A 5 "ARTHTTPPaginatedResult" 

# Search for potential item type declarations
ast-grep --pattern 'let $item: $type = $paginatedResult.items[$_]'

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the complete implementation of init(ablyCocoaData:) to verify type handling
ast-grep --pattern 'init(ablyCocoaData: Any) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any tests involving ARTHTTPPaginatedResult
rg -l "ARTHTTPPaginatedResult.*test"

# Search for actual usage of JSONValue with paginated results
rg "JSONValue.*ARTHTTPPaginatedResult" -A 5

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ARTHTTPPaginatedResult definition or usage
rg "ARTHTTPPaginatedResult" -B 2 -A 5

# Search for any files that might contain tests or usage of paginated results
fd -e swift -x grep -l "PaginatedResult"

#!/bin/bash
# Check PaginatedResult implementation
cat Sources/AblyChat/PaginatedResult.swift

# Check relevant test implementations
rg -A 10 "PaginatedResult.*items" Tests/AblyChatTests/

# Look for actual conversion of paginated items to JSONValue
rg -A 5 "items.*JSONValue" 

16-16: LGTM: Type constraint change aligns with project goals

The transition from Codable to JSONDecodable while maintaining Sendable & Equatable constraints is appropriate and maintains thread safety and comparison capabilities.

50-50: LGTM: Consistent type constraint updates

The generic constraints are consistently updated throughout the type hierarchy, maintaining type safety and protocol conformance.

Also applies to: 100-100

16-16: Verify all pagination implementations

Let's ensure all code using these pagination classes has been updated to use JSONDecodable.

Also applies to: 50-50

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Codable usage in pagination-related code
rg -l "PaginatedResult|Paginated.*Wrapper" | xargs rg "Codable"

# Search for implementations of PaginatedResult to verify they're updated
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : $$$PaginatedResult$$$'

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find pagination-related code and their type constraints

# Search for files containing PaginatedResult
rg -l "PaginatedResult"

# Search for any type definitions with Paginated prefix
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $name: $$$' --lang swift | rg "Paginated"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $name: $$$' --lang swift | rg "Paginated"

# Look for actual usage of ARTHTTPPaginatedCallbackWrapper
rg "ARTHTTPPaginatedCallbackWrapper" -A 2 -B 2

# Search for any pagination-related protocol conformance
rg "JSONDecodable|Decodable" -A 1 -B 1 | rg -A 1 -B 1 "Paginated"

18-25: Update SendMessageResponse to conform to JSONObjectDecodable

The SendMessageResponse struct now conforms to JSONObjectDecodable with a custom initializer that parses the JSON object. This change aligns with the new JSON decoding strategy and improves consistency across the codebase.

70-70: Modify makeRequest to accept Response: JSONDecodable

Updating the makeRequest function to accept a generic Response type conforming to JSONDecodable is a necessary adjustment for the new JSON handling approach. This enhances the flexibility and type safety of the decoding process.

92-93: Handle JSON decoding using JSONDecodable initializer

By converting ablyCocoaData to a JSONValue and initializing the Response using the JSONDecodable protocol, the code effectively utilizes the new custom decoding mechanism. This change ensures more precise control over the decoding process.

Line range hint 105-113: Update makePaginatedRequest to use Response: JSONDecodable

The makePaginatedRequest function now requires Response to conform to JSONDecodable, which is consistent with the updated decoding strategy. This enhances uniformity in how paginated responses are handled throughout the API.

1-2: Include necessary import for Foundation types

Adding import Foundation is appropriate to access Date and other Foundation types used in the new extensions. This ensures all dependencies are correctly imported.

32-32: Add failedToDecodeFromRawValue to JSONValueDecodingError

Introducing the failedToDecodeFromRawValue case enhances error handling when decoding raw representable values. This provides clearer feedback on decoding failures due to invalid raw values.

234-263: Implement date extraction methods from JSON

The new methods ablyProtocolDateValueForKey and optionalAblyProtocolDateValueForKey facilitate extracting Date objects from JSON values representing milliseconds since the Unix epoch. This aligns with Ably's date format and improves date handling consistency.

265-300: Add methods for decoding RawRepresentable types

The added methods rawRepresentableValueForKey and optionalRawRepresentableValueForKey enhance the ability to decode enums and other RawRepresentable types from JSON strings. This makes the decoding process more robust and type-safe.

6-6: Remove Codable conformance from MessageAction enum

Eliminating the Codable conformance from MessageAction reflects the shift towards manual JSON handling using JSONDecodable. This change prevents unnecessary automatic encoding/decoding and provides more control over the process.

3-3: Remove Codable conformance from MetadataValue

The removal of Codable conformance from MetadataValue aligns with the new custom JSON encoding and decoding approach using JSONEncodable and JSONDecodable. This modification enhances consistency and control over metadata serialization.

3-7: LGTM: Removal of Codable conformance aligns with project goals

The change to remove Codable while maintaining Sendable and Equatable is appropriate, as it aligns with the PR's objective to transition away from Decodable for realtime data handling.

Line range hint 51-66: LGTM: Clean removal of Codable conformance

The removal of Codable conformance while maintaining Sendable aligns with the project's goal to handle JSON decoding manually.

16-16: LGTM: Clean removal of Codable conformance

The removal of Codable while maintaining Sendable, Identifiable, and Equatable is appropriate and aligns with the project goals.

92-103: LGTM: Robust JSON parsing implementation

The implementation correctly:

• Maps JSON keys (clientId/roomId) to Swift properties (clientID/roomID)
• Handles optional date parsing
• Properly propagates errors from nested JSON parsing

However, consider verifying the impact of this change on the message publishing flow.