Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation inconsistency #641

Open
tuliom opened this issue Sep 11, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Documentation inconsistency #641

tuliom opened this issue Sep 11, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@tuliom
Copy link
Contributor

tuliom commented Sep 11, 2018

@ThinkOpenly reported some inconsistencies in how the Advance Toolchain is named in its own documentation:

Which names should be used?

  1. Advance toolchain (lower case t)
  2. Advance Toolchain
  3. IBM Advance Toolchain
  4. AT
  5. IBM Advance Toolchain for Linux on POWER
  6. IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux

Notice each of these names has many letter case variations, e.g. POWER, Power, power.
tuliom added a commit to tuliom/advance-toolchain that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2018
@tuliom
Improve naming consistency in the website
91925a1 
Replace references in the website to "advance toolchain" or
"Advance toolchain" with "Advance Toolchain".

Related to issue advancetoolchain#641.

Signed-off-by: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <[email protected]>
@tuliom tuliom mentioned this issue Sep 26, 2018
Merged
tuliom added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
@tuliom
Improve naming consistency in the website
ff67ef7 
Replace references in the website to "advance toolchain" or
"Advance toolchain" with "Advance Toolchain".

Related to issue #641.

Signed-off-by: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <[email protected]>
@mscastanho
Copy link
Contributor

@tuliom Can all those other references be changed to Advance Toolchain, as it seems to be the most widely used name across code and docs? If positive, I can create a patch for this.

@tuliom
Copy link
Contributor Author

tuliom commented Jan 13, 2020

@mscastanho I believe there is still a debate on what should be used.

In my previous patch I removed all references to "advance toolchain" or "Advance toolchain" as they were clearly wrong.

I believe "IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux" should be also replaced.

@mscastanho mscastanho mentioned this issue Dec 3, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tuliom @mscastanho