You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
Often, when pull requests (PRs) are raised, reviewers may lack crucial context about the changes proposed. This can lead to delays in the review process and misunderstandings between contributors and reviewers.
Describe the solution you'd like:
I propose implementing an automatic commenting system that triggers whenever a new PR is raised. This system would generate a predefined comment containing essential context about the changes, such as the purpose of the modifications, relevant issue or feature IDs, and specific instructions for reviewers.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
One alternative could be relying solely on manual comments by reviewers upon PR creation. However, this approach may be time-consuming and inconsistent across different reviewers. Another option could be not providing any initial comments on PRs, but this would result in contributors having to repeatedly provide context to reviewers, slowing down the review process.
Additional context:
Automating the commenting process upon PR creation would streamline the review process, improve communication between contributors and reviewers, and ultimately enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our project's development workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
Often, when pull requests (PRs) are raised, reviewers may lack crucial context about the changes proposed. This can lead to delays in the review process and misunderstandings between contributors and reviewers.
Describe the solution you'd like:
I propose implementing an automatic commenting system that triggers whenever a new PR is raised. This system would generate a predefined comment containing essential context about the changes, such as the purpose of the modifications, relevant issue or feature IDs, and specific instructions for reviewers.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
One alternative could be relying solely on manual comments by reviewers upon PR creation. However, this approach may be time-consuming and inconsistent across different reviewers. Another option could be not providing any initial comments on PRs, but this would result in contributors having to repeatedly provide context to reviewers, slowing down the review process.
Additional context:
Automating the commenting process upon PR creation would streamline the review process, improve communication between contributors and reviewers, and ultimately enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our project's development workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: