Skip to content

GSConv code #31

@stoor2kushidai

Description

@stoor2kushidai

In the implementation of GSConv, the second layer of convolution is not the DWConv pointed in the paper, but a standard convolution. What is the reason for this?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions