You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, the opentelemetry-go-auto-instrumentation library seems to only support the OTLP exporter for telemetry data export. While OTLP is a standard protocol, many users, especially those using existing telemetry systems like Jaeger and Zipkin, might find it beneficial to have native support for exporting trace data directly to these systems.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add support for mainstream telemetry receivers, such as Jaeger and Zipkin, directly within the opentelemetry-go-auto-instrumentation library. This will allow users to configure their preferred exporter without additional middleware or bridges.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Relying on OTLP and implementing bridges (e.g., OTLP-to-Jaeger or OTLP-to-Zipkin). While this approach works, it introduces additional layers of complexity and operational overhead.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, the opentelemetry-go-auto-instrumentation library seems to only support the OTLP exporter for telemetry data export. While OTLP is a standard protocol, many users, especially those using existing telemetry systems like Jaeger and Zipkin, might find it beneficial to have native support for exporting trace data directly to these systems.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add support for mainstream telemetry receivers, such as Jaeger and Zipkin, directly within the opentelemetry-go-auto-instrumentation library. This will allow users to configure their preferred exporter without additional middleware or bridges.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Relying on OTLP and implementing bridges (e.g., OTLP-to-Jaeger or OTLP-to-Zipkin). While this approach works, it introduces additional layers of complexity and operational overhead.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: