You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@danyaljj Firstly thanks for releasing the dataset!
If I understood correctly, every perturbed example in this dataset has been created from some seed example from the original BOOLQ dataset. But there seem to be a few clusters (eg. id=25894) which have no seed questions. Is this behaviour expected or am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You're right, some clusters in the data don't have instances that belong to BoolQ.
Here is why: after perturbing the BoolQ [subset] instances, we have a verification step where humans check if a given question is well-formed questions (i.e., humans agree on its answer). Few of the BoolQ [subset] instances were deleted at this stage since our human annotators didn't like them.
Thanks, that makes sense! I was under the impression that the verification step is only performed for perturbed instances. I suppose that is also the reason why some clusters have size = 1.
@danyaljj Firstly thanks for releasing the dataset!
If I understood correctly, every perturbed example in this dataset has been created from some seed example from the original BOOLQ dataset. But there seem to be a few clusters (eg. id=25894) which have no seed questions. Is this behaviour expected or am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: