diff --git a/submissions/dbasunag/opendatahub-tests/2026-02-18T19-35-35-assessment.json b/submissions/dbasunag/opendatahub-tests/2026-02-18T19-35-35-assessment.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0e73802d --- /dev/null +++ b/submissions/dbasunag/opendatahub-tests/2026-02-18T19-35-35-assessment.json @@ -0,0 +1,926 @@ +{ + "schema_version": "1.0.0", + "metadata": { + "agentready_version": "2.28.0", + "research_version": "1.0.1", + "assessment_timestamp": "2026-02-18T14:34:27.847040", + "assessment_timestamp_human": "February 18, 2026 at 2:34 PM", + "executed_by": "dbasunag@dbasunag-mac", + "command": "/Users/dbasunag/.local/bin/agentready assess . --exclude architecture_decisions --exclude openapi_specs --exclude test_coverage", + "working_directory": "/Users/dbasunag/repos/opendatahub-tests" + }, + "repository": { + "path": "/Users/dbasunag/repos/opendatahub-tests", + "name": "opendatahub-tests", + "url": "git@github.com:dbasunag/opendatahub-tests.git", + "branch": "main", + "commit_hash": "bab5b5e6d4111a4dcc1f8532b4fcc4908edca4f8", + "languages": { + "YAML": 18, + "Python": 374, + "JSON": 242, + "Markdown": 11 + }, + "total_files": 663, + "total_lines": 109166 + }, + "timestamp": "2026-02-18T14:34:27.847040", + "overall_score": 69.9, + "certification_level": "Silver", + "attributes_assessed": 21, + "attributes_skipped": 1, + "attributes_total": 22, + "findings": [ + { + "attribute": { + "id": "claude_md_file", + "name": "CLAUDE.md Configuration Files", + "category": "Context Window Optimization", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Project-specific configuration for Claude Code", + "criteria": "CLAUDE.md file exists in repository root", + "default_weight": 0.1 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 90.0, + "measured_value": "AGENTS.md present", + "threshold": "CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md", + "evidence": [ + "CLAUDE.md not found", + "AGENTS.md found with 3613 bytes (alternative)", + "Consider adding CLAUDE.md as symlink or @ reference for broader tool support" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "readme_structure", + "name": "README Structure", + "category": "Documentation Standards", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Well-structured README with key sections", + "criteria": "README.md with installation, usage, and development sections", + "default_weight": 0.1 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 66.66666666666666, + "measured_value": "2/3 sections", + "threshold": "3/3 sections", + "evidence": [ + "Found 2/3 essential sections", + "Installation: \u2713", + "Usage: \u2717", + "Development: \u2713" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Create or enhance README.md with essential sections", + "steps": [ + "Add project overview and description", + "Include installation/setup instructions", + "Document basic usage with examples", + "Add development/contributing guidelines", + "Include build and test commands" + ], + "tools": [], + "commands": [], + "examples": [ + "# Project Name\n\n## Overview\nWhat this project does and why it exists.\n\n## Installation\n```bash\npip install -e .\n```\n\n## Usage\n```bash\nmyproject --help\n```\n\n## Development\n```bash\n# Run tests\npytest\n\n# Format code\nblack .\n```\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "GitHub", + "title": "About READMEs", + "url": "https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-readmes", + "relevance": "Best practices for README structure" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "type_annotations", + "name": "Type Annotations", + "category": "Code Quality", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Type hints in function signatures", + "criteria": ">80% of functions have type annotations", + "default_weight": 0.1 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 100.0, + "measured_value": "85.6%", + "threshold": "\u226580%", + "evidence": [ + "Typed functions: 1331/1555", + "Coverage: 85.6%" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "standard_layout", + "name": "Standard Project Layouts", + "category": "Repository Structure", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Follows standard project structure for language", + "criteria": "Standard directories (src/, tests/, docs/) present", + "default_weight": 0.1 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 50.0, + "measured_value": "1/2 directories", + "threshold": "2/2 directories", + "evidence": [ + "Found 1/2 standard directories", + "src/: \u2717", + "tests/: \u2713" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Organize code into standard directories (src/, tests/, docs/)", + "steps": [ + "Create src/ directory for source code", + "Create tests/ directory for test files", + "Create docs/ directory for documentation", + "Move source code into src/", + "Move tests into tests/" + ], + "tools": [], + "commands": [ + "mkdir -p src tests docs", + "# Move source files to src/", + "# Move test files to tests/" + ], + "examples": [], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "Python Packaging Authority", + "title": "Python Project Structure", + "url": "https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/", + "relevance": "Standard Python project layout" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "lock_files", + "name": "Dependency Pinning for Reproducibility", + "category": "Dependency Management", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Dependencies pinned to exact versions in lock files", + "criteria": "Lock file with pinned versions, updated within 6 months", + "default_weight": 0.1 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 100.0, + "measured_value": "uv.lock", + "threshold": "lock file with pinned versions, < 6 months old", + "evidence": [ + "Found lock file(s): uv.lock" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "dependency_security", + "name": "Dependency Security & Vulnerability Scanning", + "category": "Security", + "tier": 1, + "description": "Security scanning tools configured for dependencies and code", + "criteria": "Dependabot, CodeQL, or SAST tools configured; secret detection enabled", + "default_weight": 0.04 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 20, + "measured_value": "Security tools configured: detect-secrets, gitleaks", + "threshold": "\u226560 points (Dependabot + SAST or multiple scanners)", + "evidence": [ + "\u2713 Secret detection configured (detect-secrets, gitleaks)" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Configure security scanning for dependencies and code", + "steps": [ + "Enable Dependabot in GitHub repository settings", + "Add .github/dependabot.yml configuration file", + "Set up CodeQL scanning for SAST", + "Add secret detection to pre-commit hooks", + "Configure language-specific security scanners" + ], + "tools": [ + "Dependabot", + "CodeQL", + "detect-secrets", + "Bandit", + "Semgrep" + ], + "commands": [ + "gh repo edit --enable-security", + "pip install pre-commit detect-secrets", + "pre-commit install" + ], + "examples": [ + "# .github/dependabot.yml\nversion: 2\nupdates:\n - package-ecosystem: pip\n directory: /\n schedule:\n interval: weekly", + "# .pre-commit-config.yaml\nrepos:\n - repo: https://github.com/Yelp/detect-secrets\n rev: v1.4.0\n hooks:\n - id: detect-secrets" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "OWASP", + "title": "OWASP Top 10", + "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/", + "relevance": "Industry-standard list of critical web application security risks" + }, + { + "source": "GitHub", + "title": "Security Best Practices", + "url": "https://docs.github.com/en/code-security", + "relevance": "Official GitHub security features and best practices documentation" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "precommit_hooks", + "name": "Pre-commit Hooks & CI/CD Linting", + "category": "Testing & CI/CD", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Pre-commit hooks configured for linting and formatting", + "criteria": ".pre-commit-config.yaml exists", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 100.0, + "measured_value": "configured", + "threshold": "configured", + "evidence": [ + ".pre-commit-config.yaml found" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "conventional_commits", + "name": "Conventional Commit Messages", + "category": "Git & Version Control", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Follows conventional commit format", + "criteria": "\u226580% of recent commits follow convention", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 0.0, + "measured_value": "not configured", + "threshold": "configured", + "evidence": [ + "No commitlint or husky configuration" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Configure conventional commits with commitlint", + "steps": [ + "Install commitlint", + "Configure husky for commit-msg hook" + ], + "tools": [ + "commitlint", + "husky" + ], + "commands": [ + "npm install --save-dev @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional husky" + ], + "examples": [], + "citations": [] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "gitignore_completeness", + "name": ".gitignore Completeness", + "category": "Git & Version Control", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Comprehensive .gitignore file with language-specific patterns", + "criteria": ".gitignore exists and includes language-specific patterns from GitHub templates", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 83.33333333333334, + "measured_value": "10/12 patterns", + "threshold": "\u226570% of language-specific patterns", + "evidence": [ + ".gitignore found (3304 bytes)", + "Pattern coverage: 10/12 (83%)", + "Missing 2 recommended patterns" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "one_command_setup", + "name": "One-Command Build/Setup", + "category": "Build & Development", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Single command to set up development environment from fresh clone", + "criteria": "Single command (make setup, npm install, etc.) documented prominently", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 60, + "measured_value": "multi-step setup", + "threshold": "single command", + "evidence": [ + "No clear setup command found in README", + "Setup automation found: Makefile, pyproject.toml", + "Setup instructions in prominent location" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Create single-command setup for development environment", + "steps": [ + "Choose setup automation tool (Makefile, setup script, or package manager)", + "Create setup command that handles all dependencies", + "Document setup command prominently in README (Quick Start section)", + "Ensure setup is idempotent (safe to run multiple times)", + "Test setup on fresh clone to verify it works" + ], + "tools": [ + "make", + "npm", + "pip", + "poetry" + ], + "commands": [ + "# Example Makefile", + "cat > Makefile << 'EOF'", + ".PHONY: setup", + "setup:", + "\tpython -m venv venv", + "\t. venv/bin/activate && pip install -r requirements.txt", + "\tpre-commit install", + "\tcp .env.example .env", + "\t@echo 'Setup complete! Run make test to verify.'", + "EOF" + ], + "examples": [ + "# Quick Start section in README\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```bash\nmake setup # One command to set up development environment\nmake test # Run tests to verify setup\n```\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "freeCodeCamp", + "title": "Using make for project automation", + "url": "https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/want-to-know-the-easiest-way-to-save-time-use-make/", + "relevance": "Guide to using Makefiles for one-command setup" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "file_size_limits", + "name": "File Size Limits", + "category": "Context Window Optimization", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Files are reasonably sized for AI context windows", + "criteria": "<5% of files >500 lines, no files >1000 lines", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 64.6524064171123, + "measured_value": "2 huge, 20 large out of 374", + "threshold": "<5% files >500 lines, 0 files >1000 lines", + "evidence": [ + "Found 2 files >1000 lines (0.5% of 374 files)", + "Largest: tests/model_registry/utils.py (1046 lines)" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Refactor large files into smaller, focused modules", + "steps": [ + "Identify files >1000 lines", + "Split into logical submodules", + "Extract classes/functions into separate files", + "Maintain single responsibility principle" + ], + "tools": [ + "refactoring tools", + "linters" + ], + "commands": [], + "examples": [ + "# Split large file:\n# models.py (1500 lines) \u2192 models/user.py, models/product.py, models/order.py" + ], + "citations": [] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "separation_of_concerns", + "name": "Separation of Concerns", + "category": "Code Organization", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Code organized with single responsibility per module", + "criteria": "Feature-based organization, cohesive modules, low coupling", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 65.19287833827893, + "measured_value": "organization:100, cohesion:84, naming:0", + "threshold": "\u226575 overall", + "evidence": [ + "Good directory organization (feature-based or flat)", + "File cohesion: 486/3033 files >500 lines", + "Anti-pattern files found: utils.py, utils.py, utils.py" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Refactor code to improve separation of concerns", + "steps": [ + "Avoid layer-based directories (models/, views/, controllers/)", + "Organize by feature/domain instead (auth/, users/, billing/)", + "Break large files (>500 lines) into focused modules", + "Eliminate catch-all modules (utils.py, helpers.py)", + "Each module should have single, well-defined responsibility", + "Group related functions/classes by domain, not technical layer" + ], + "tools": [], + "commands": [], + "examples": [ + "# Good: Feature-based organization\nproject/\n\u251c\u2500\u2500 auth/\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 login.py\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 signup.py\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 tokens.py\n\u251c\u2500\u2500 users/\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 profile.py\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 preferences.py\n\u2514\u2500\u2500 billing/\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 invoices.py\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 payments.py\n\n# Bad: Layer-based organization\nproject/\n\u251c\u2500\u2500 models/\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 user.py\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 invoice.py\n\u251c\u2500\u2500 views/\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 user_view.py\n\u2502 \u251c\u2500\u2500 invoice_view.py\n\u2514\u2500\u2500 controllers/\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 user_controller.py\n \u251c\u2500\u2500 invoice_controller.py\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "Martin Fowler", + "title": "PresentationDomainDataLayering", + "url": "https://martinfowler.com/bliki/PresentationDomainDataLayering.html", + "relevance": "Explains layering vs feature organization" + }, + { + "source": "Uncle Bob Martin", + "title": "The Single Responsibility Principle", + "url": "https://blog.cleancoder.com/uncle-bob/2014/05/08/SingleReponsibilityPrinciple.html", + "relevance": "Core SRP principle for module design" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "concise_documentation", + "name": "Concise Documentation", + "category": "Documentation", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Documentation maximizes information density while minimizing token consumption", + "criteria": "README <500 lines with clear structure, bullet points over prose", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 61.0, + "measured_value": "16 lines, 4 headings, 0 bullets", + "threshold": "<500 lines, structured format", + "evidence": [ + "README length: 16 lines (excellent)", + "Heading density: 25.0 per 100 lines (target: 3-5)", + "Only 0 bullet points (prefer bullets over prose)" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Make documentation more concise and structured", + "steps": [ + "Break long README into multiple documents (docs/ directory)", + "Add clear Markdown headings (##, ###) for structure", + "Convert prose paragraphs to bullet points where possible", + "Add table of contents for documents >100 lines", + "Use code blocks instead of describing commands in prose", + "Move detailed content to wiki or docs/, keep README focused" + ], + "tools": [], + "commands": [ + "# Check README length", + "wc -l README.md", + "", + "# Count headings", + "grep -c '^#' README.md" + ], + "examples": [ + "# Good: Concise with structure\n\n## Quick Start\n```bash\npip install -e .\nagentready assess .\n```\n\n## Features\n- Fast repository scanning\n- HTML and Markdown reports\n- 25 agent-ready attributes\n\n## Documentation\nSee [docs/](docs/) for detailed guides.\n", + "# Bad: Verbose prose\n\nThis project is a tool that helps you assess your repository\nagainst best practices for AI-assisted development. It works by\nscanning your codebase and checking for various attributes that\nmake repositories more effective when working with AI coding\nassistants like Claude Code...\n\n[Many more paragraphs of prose...]\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "ArXiv", + "title": "LongCodeBench: Evaluating Coding LLMs at 1M Context Windows", + "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00343", + "relevance": "Research showing performance degradation with long contexts" + }, + { + "source": "Markdown Guide", + "title": "Basic Syntax", + "url": "https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/", + "relevance": "Best practices for Markdown formatting" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "inline_documentation", + "name": "Inline Documentation", + "category": "Documentation", + "tier": 2, + "description": "Function, class, and module-level documentation using language-specific conventions", + "criteria": "\u226580% of public functions/classes have docstrings", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 58.52668213457076, + "measured_value": "46.8%", + "threshold": "\u226580%", + "evidence": [ + "Documented items: 1009/2155", + "Coverage: 46.8%", + "Many public functions/classes lack docstrings" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Add docstrings to public functions and classes", + "steps": [ + "Identify functions/classes without docstrings", + "Add PEP 257 compliant docstrings for Python", + "Add JSDoc comments for JavaScript/TypeScript", + "Include: description, parameters, return values, exceptions", + "Add examples for complex functions", + "Run pydocstyle to validate docstring format" + ], + "tools": [ + "pydocstyle", + "jsdoc" + ], + "commands": [ + "# Install pydocstyle", + "pip install pydocstyle", + "", + "# Check docstring coverage", + "pydocstyle src/", + "", + "# Generate documentation", + "pip install sphinx", + "sphinx-apidoc -o docs/ src/" + ], + "examples": [ + "# Python - Good docstring\ndef calculate_discount(price: float, discount_percent: float) -> float:\n \"\"\"Calculate discounted price.\n\n Args:\n price: Original price in USD\n discount_percent: Discount percentage (0-100)\n\n Returns:\n Discounted price\n\n Raises:\n ValueError: If discount_percent not in 0-100 range\n\n Example:\n >>> calculate_discount(100.0, 20.0)\n 80.0\n \"\"\"\n if not 0 <= discount_percent <= 100:\n raise ValueError(\"Discount must be 0-100\")\n return price * (1 - discount_percent / 100)\n", + "// JavaScript - Good JSDoc\n/**\n * Calculate discounted price\n *\n * @param {number} price - Original price in USD\n * @param {number} discountPercent - Discount percentage (0-100)\n * @returns {number} Discounted price\n * @throws {Error} If discountPercent not in 0-100 range\n * @example\n * calculateDiscount(100.0, 20.0)\n * // Returns: 80.0\n */\nfunction calculateDiscount(price, discountPercent) {\n if (discountPercent < 0 || discountPercent > 100) {\n throw new Error(\"Discount must be 0-100\");\n }\n return price * (1 - discountPercent / 100);\n}\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "Python.org", + "title": "PEP 257 - Docstring Conventions", + "url": "https://peps.python.org/pep-0257/", + "relevance": "Python docstring standards" + }, + { + "source": "TypeScript", + "title": "TSDoc Reference", + "url": "https://tsdoc.org/", + "relevance": "TypeScript documentation standard" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "cyclomatic_complexity", + "name": "Cyclomatic Complexity Thresholds", + "category": "Code Quality", + "tier": 3, + "description": "Cyclomatic complexity thresholds enforced", + "criteria": "Average complexity <10, no functions >15", + "default_weight": 0.03 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 100.0, + "measured_value": "2.8", + "threshold": "<10.0", + "evidence": [ + "Average cyclomatic complexity: 2.8" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "issue_pr_templates", + "name": "Issue & Pull Request Templates", + "category": "Repository Structure", + "tier": 3, + "description": "Standardized templates for issues and PRs", + "criteria": "PR template and issue templates in .github/", + "default_weight": 0.015 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 0, + "measured_value": "PR:False, Issues:0", + "threshold": "PR template + \u22652 issue templates", + "evidence": [ + "No PR template found", + "No issue template directory found" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Create GitHub issue and PR templates in .github/ directory", + "steps": [ + "Create .github/ directory if it doesn't exist", + "Add PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md for PRs", + "Create .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ directory", + "Add bug_report.md for bug reports", + "Add feature_request.md for feature requests", + "Optionally add config.yml to configure template chooser" + ], + "tools": [ + "gh" + ], + "commands": [ + "# Create directories", + "mkdir -p .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE", + "", + "# Create PR template", + "cat > .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md << 'EOF'", + "## Summary", + "", + "", + "## Related Issues", + "Fixes #", + "", + "## Testing", + "- [ ] Tests added/updated", + "- [ ] All tests pass", + "", + "## Checklist", + "- [ ] Documentation updated", + "- [ ] CHANGELOG.md updated", + "EOF" + ], + "examples": [ + "# Bug Report Template (.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md)\n\n```markdown\n---\nname: Bug Report\nabout: Create a report to help us improve\ntitle: '[BUG] '\nlabels: bug\nassignees: ''\n---\n\n**Describe the bug**\nA clear description of what the bug is.\n\n**To Reproduce**\nSteps to reproduce:\n1. Go to '...'\n2. Click on '....'\n3. See error\n\n**Expected behavior**\nWhat you expected to happen.\n\n**Environment**\n- OS: [e.g. macOS 13.0]\n- Version: [e.g. 1.0.0]\n```\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "GitHub Docs", + "title": "About issue and pull request templates", + "url": "https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/about-issue-and-pull-request-templates", + "relevance": "Official GitHub guide for templates" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "cicd_pipeline_visibility", + "name": "CI/CD Pipeline Visibility", + "category": "Testing & CI/CD", + "tier": 3, + "description": "Clear, well-documented CI/CD configuration files", + "criteria": "CI config with descriptive names, caching, parallelization", + "default_weight": 0.015 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 60, + "measured_value": "basic config", + "threshold": "CI with best practices", + "evidence": [ + "CI config found: .github/workflows/add-remove-labels.yml, .github/workflows/workflow-review.yml, .github/workflows/add-welcome-comment-set-assignee.yml, .github/workflows/labeler.yml, .github/workflows/build-push-container-on-merge.yml, .github/workflows/size-labeler.yml, .github/workflows/cherry-pick-comment.yml, .github/workflows/tox-tests.yml, .github/workflows/push-container-on-comment.yml, .github/workflows/verify_build_container.yml, .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml, .github/workflows/on-review-add-label.yml, .github/workflows/delete-image-tag.yml", + "Descriptive job/step names found", + "No caching detected", + "No parallelization detected" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Add or improve CI/CD pipeline configuration", + "steps": [ + "Create CI config for your platform (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.)", + "Define jobs: lint, test, build", + "Use descriptive job and step names", + "Configure dependency caching", + "Enable parallel job execution", + "Upload artifacts: test results, coverage reports", + "Add status badge to README" + ], + "tools": [ + "github-actions", + "gitlab-ci", + "circleci" + ], + "commands": [ + "# Create GitHub Actions workflow", + "mkdir -p .github/workflows", + "touch .github/workflows/ci.yml", + "", + "# Validate workflow", + "gh workflow view ci.yml" + ], + "examples": [ + "# .github/workflows/ci.yml - Good example\n\nname: CI Pipeline\n\non:\n push:\n branches: [main]\n pull_request:\n branches: [main]\n\njobs:\n lint:\n name: Lint Code\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n\n - name: Set up Python\n uses: actions/setup-python@v5\n with:\n python-version: '3.11'\n cache: 'pip' # Caching\n\n - name: Install dependencies\n run: pip install -r requirements.txt\n\n - name: Run linters\n run: |\n black --check .\n isort --check .\n ruff check .\n\n test:\n name: Run Tests\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n\n - name: Set up Python\n uses: actions/setup-python@v5\n with:\n python-version: '3.11'\n cache: 'pip'\n\n - name: Install dependencies\n run: pip install -r requirements.txt\n\n - name: Run tests with coverage\n run: pytest --cov --cov-report=xml\n\n - name: Upload coverage reports\n uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3\n with:\n files: ./coverage.xml\n\n build:\n name: Build Package\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n needs: [lint, test] # Runs after lint/test pass\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n\n - name: Build package\n run: python -m build\n\n - name: Upload build artifacts\n uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3\n with:\n name: dist\n path: dist/\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "GitHub", + "title": "GitHub Actions Documentation", + "url": "https://docs.github.com/en/actions", + "relevance": "Official GitHub Actions guide" + }, + { + "source": "CircleCI", + "title": "CI/CD Best Practices", + "url": "https://circleci.com/blog/ci-cd-best-practices/", + "relevance": "Industry best practices for CI/CD" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "semantic_naming", + "name": "Semantic Naming", + "category": "Code Quality", + "tier": 3, + "description": "Systematic naming patterns following language conventions", + "criteria": "Language conventions followed, avoid generic names", + "default_weight": 0.015 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 100.0, + "measured_value": "functions:100%, classes:100%", + "threshold": "\u226575% compliance", + "evidence": [ + "Functions: 267/267 follow snake_case (100.0%)", + "Classes: 39/39 follow PascalCase (100.0%)", + "No generic names (temp, data, obj) detected" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "structured_logging", + "name": "Structured Logging", + "category": "Code Quality", + "tier": 3, + "description": "Logging in structured format (JSON) with consistent fields", + "criteria": "Structured logging library configured (structlog, winston, zap)", + "default_weight": 0.015 + }, + "status": "fail", + "score": 0.0, + "measured_value": "not configured", + "threshold": "structured logging library", + "evidence": [ + "No structured logging library found", + "Checked files: pyproject.toml", + "Using built-in logging module (unstructured)" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Add structured logging library for machine-parseable logs", + "steps": [ + "Choose structured logging library (structlog for Python, winston for Node.js)", + "Install library and configure JSON formatter", + "Add standard fields: timestamp, level, message, context", + "Include request context: request_id, user_id, session_id", + "Use consistent field naming (snake_case for Python)", + "Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, PII)", + "Configure different formats for dev (pretty) and prod (JSON)" + ], + "tools": [ + "structlog", + "winston", + "zap" + ], + "commands": [ + "# Install structlog", + "pip install structlog", + "", + "# Configure structlog", + "# See examples for configuration" + ], + "examples": [ + "# Python with structlog\nimport structlog\n\n# Configure structlog\nstructlog.configure(\n processors=[\n structlog.stdlib.add_log_level,\n structlog.processors.TimeStamper(fmt=\"iso\"),\n structlog.processors.JSONRenderer()\n ]\n)\n\nlogger = structlog.get_logger()\n\n# Good: Structured logging\nlogger.info(\n \"user_login\",\n user_id=\"123\",\n email=\"user@example.com\",\n ip_address=\"192.168.1.1\"\n)\n\n# Bad: Unstructured logging\nlogger.info(f\"User {user_id} logged in from {ip}\")\n" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "structlog", + "title": "structlog Documentation", + "url": "https://www.structlog.org/en/stable/", + "relevance": "Python structured logging library" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "branch_protection", + "name": "Branch Protection Rules", + "category": "Git & Version Control", + "tier": 4, + "description": "Required status checks and review approvals before merging", + "criteria": "Branch protection enabled with status checks and required reviews", + "default_weight": 0.005 + }, + "status": "not_applicable", + "score": null, + "measured_value": null, + "threshold": null, + "evidence": [ + "Requires GitHub API integration for branch protection checks. Future implementation will verify: required status checks, required reviews, force push prevention, and branch update requirements." + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "code_smells", + "name": "Code Smell Elimination", + "category": "Code Quality", + "tier": 4, + "description": "Linter configuration for detecting code smells and anti-patterns", + "criteria": "Language-specific linters configured (pylint, ESLint, RuboCop, etc.)", + "default_weight": 0.01 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 66.66666666666666, + "measured_value": "pylint, ruff", + "threshold": "\u226560% of applicable linters configured", + "evidence": [ + "Linters configured: pylint, ruff", + "Coverage: 40/60 points (67%)" + ], + "remediation": null, + "error_message": null + }, + { + "attribute": { + "id": "container_setup", + "name": "Container/Virtualization Setup", + "category": "Build & Development", + "tier": 4, + "description": "Container configuration for consistent development environments", + "criteria": "Dockerfile/Containerfile, docker-compose.yml, .dockerignore, multi-stage builds", + "default_weight": 0.01 + }, + "status": "pass", + "score": 60, + "measured_value": "60 points", + "threshold": "\u226570 points (Dockerfile + compose + .dockerignore)", + "evidence": [ + "\u2713 Dockerfile present", + "\u2139\ufe0f Single-stage build (consider multi-stage for smaller images)", + "\u2713 .dockerignore present (excludes unnecessary files)" + ], + "remediation": { + "summary": "Improve container configuration", + "steps": [ + "Add docker-compose.yml for multi-service development", + "Create .dockerignore to exclude build artifacts and secrets", + "Consider multi-stage builds to reduce image size" + ], + "tools": [ + "docker", + "podman", + "docker-compose" + ], + "commands": [ + "docker build -t myapp .", + "docker-compose up -d" + ], + "examples": [ + "# .dockerignore example\n.git\n.venv\n__pycache__\n*.pyc\n.env\nnode_modules", + "# Multi-stage Dockerfile example\nFROM node:18 AS builder\nWORKDIR /app\nCOPY . .\nRUN npm ci && npm run build\n\nFROM node:18-alpine\nWORKDIR /app\nCOPY --from=builder /app/dist ./dist\nCMD [\"node\", \"dist/index.js\"]" + ], + "citations": [ + { + "source": "Docker", + "title": "Dockerfile Best Practices", + "url": "https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/", + "relevance": "Official Docker guide for writing efficient and secure Dockerfiles" + } + ] + }, + "error_message": null + } + ], + "config": { + "weights": {}, + "excluded_attributes": [], + "language_overrides": {}, + "output_dir": null, + "report_theme": "default", + "custom_theme": null + }, + "duration_seconds": 2.0, + "discovered_skills": [] +} \ No newline at end of file