You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Often we can guess from context whether amr-unknown refers to a person or not, as in these Dictionary examples:
What did the girl find? (find-01 :ARG0 girl :ARG1 amr-unknown)
Whose car is this? (car :poss amr-unknown :domain this)
But sometimes it is ambiguous: the first AMR would also apply to "Who did the girl find?" Likewise, currently "Who did you see?" and "What did you see?" both collapse to (see-01 :ARG0 you :ARG1 amr-unknown). AFAICT this is an exception in AMR: normally we do not remove animacy distinctions that are present in the language; "he" and "she" are retained rather than collapsed with "it", for example.
Would it be worth marking the distinction, e.g. mapping "who" to amr-unknown-person or amr-unknown :mod person ('which person')?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Often we can guess from context whether
amr-unknown
refers to a person or not, as in these Dictionary examples:(find-01 :ARG0 girl :ARG1 amr-unknown)
(car :poss amr-unknown :domain this)
But sometimes it is ambiguous: the first AMR would also apply to "Who did the girl find?" Likewise, currently "Who did you see?" and "What did you see?" both collapse to
(see-01 :ARG0 you :ARG1 amr-unknown)
. AFAICT this is an exception in AMR: normally we do not remove animacy distinctions that are present in the language; "he" and "she" are retained rather than collapsed with "it", for example.Would it be worth marking the distinction, e.g. mapping "who" to
amr-unknown-person
oramr-unknown :mod person
('which person')?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: