Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question regarding the secrets cataloger #1954

Closed
tomerse-sg opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Question regarding the secrets cataloger #1954

tomerse-sg opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tomerse-sg
Copy link

What would you like to be added:
I've tried to use the secrets cataloger, and I saw it can only be used via the power-user command.
When I run it, I saw the message -
DEPRECATED: This command will be removed in v1.0.0
is it possible to create a separate command in order to use the secrets cataloger?
Why is this needed:
will be able to look for sensitive data leak

@tomerse-sg tomerse-sg added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 25, 2023
@wagoodman
Copy link
Contributor

Almost all features of the power-user command will be accessible from the root command around syft 1.0. The secrets cataloger is the exception here -- after further discussion we've decided that there are other tools for this and it is generally out of scope for the functionality of generating SBOMs, which is the primary purpose of syft.

I'm going to close this for now since it answers the question on the issue, however, feel free to continue the conversation here or open another issue for other questions 👍 .

@wagoodman wagoodman closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 27, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in OSS Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants