You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the the IFTA terminates after a given number of iteration regardless of the performance.
The current algorithm's performance is not measured.
However, it seems to lack improvement already after a hand full of iterations. Some literature suggests that hundreds of iterations might be required for optimal performance, as I recall. It should be further investigated if this proves to be the case.
Better performance metrics and their potential implementation details could be explored.
Proposed solution
Consider a new abort criteria for the IFTA. Explore how to measure performance (e.g. uniformity error, diffraction efficiency)
Alternatives considered
Keep the simple hardcoded abort criteria.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Currently, the the IFTA terminates after a given number of iteration regardless of the performance.
The current algorithm's performance is not measured.
However, it seems to lack improvement already after a hand full of iterations. Some literature suggests that hundreds of iterations might be required for optimal performance, as I recall. It should be further investigated if this proves to be the case.
Better performance metrics and their potential implementation details could be explored.
Proposed solution
Consider a new abort criteria for the IFTA. Explore how to measure performance (e.g. uniformity error, diffraction efficiency)
Alternatives considered
Keep the simple hardcoded abort criteria.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: