You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, when we build and run your hello-neon sample app on my Pixel 2 (Snapdragon 835) and Pixel 9 (Tensor G4), both show a worse performance using Neon as shown below
Upon some initial investigation, our SIMD experts are worried about this sample code's FIR filter's Neon algorithm being sub-optimal, thus not leveraging Neon's potentials on performance boost.
Please let us know your thoughts and we can follow up either in public or private (e.g. via my @arm.com email)
Thank you and happy holidays 🎄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hanyin-arm
changed the title
[BUG] Neon approach performs worse than C approach
[BUG] Neon performs worse than C
Dec 19, 2024
That sample was actually rewritten last year but is still waiting for review from a team member with more experience in vectorization. You can see the PR here: #1067.
Upon some initial investigation, our SIMD experts are worried about this sample code's FIR filter's Neon algorithm being sub-optimal
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me at all. The whole sample will be removed once the new one merges though :)
Hi, when we build and run your
hello-neon
sample app on my Pixel 2 (Snapdragon 835) and Pixel 9 (Tensor G4), both show a worse performance using Neon as shown belowUpon some initial investigation, our SIMD experts are worried about this sample code's FIR filter's Neon algorithm being sub-optimal, thus not leveraging Neon's potentials on performance boost.
Please let us know your thoughts and we can follow up either in public or private (e.g. via my @arm.com email)
Thank you and happy holidays 🎄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: