-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to get the most accurate result #12
Comments
I tried a different setting for this model, refer comment: #5 (comment) |
There may be couple of others reason...
|
@anilsathyan7 Thanks for your reply. In the first reason you said mobilenetv2(depth multiplier 0.5) has more high accuracy ? |
@anilsathyan7 the models under dir |
If you go to the aforementioned mobilenetv3 link, there are different version of the model.
You can get the pretrained model with weights using the below code:- Now you can replace the encoder part in our model with this, connect it to the decoder and finally train the model. Model-3 is prisma-net architecture and the models in the directory: |
What is the model that you have under tensorflowjs? |
Curious about the question above as well. Tried to convert all models from h5 to TensorFlowJS, but none of them seems to perform as well as the exiting one. |
The model under tfjs is 'deconv_fin_munet'. It's a model with 128 input isize ,inside folder models/transpose_seg. |
Hello, when I test your
test.py
withmodels/mnv3_seg/munet_mnv3_wm10.h5
andmodels/mnv3_seg/munet_mnv3_wm10.h5
, I find the result is not very good. What model and parameters I should set to get the accurate result? Can you give some advises?Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: