Bug: Timeline in 'Programs' page is breaking

[iamkryptonite]

Describe the bug

The timeline in 'Programs' page is not working. The marker does not show the current date at the correct place in the timeline. Instead the marker keeps looping in one place. For example if todays date is 3rd March, instead of showing it in the appropriate place in the timeline it will be shown in '3rd January' .

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Run the local server on your device
2. Click on 'Programs'
3. See error

Expected behavior

The marker in timeline is suppose to show the current date and month in the correct place and should keep progressing everyday smoothly.

Screenshots

Desktop :

• OS: Windows
• Browser: Firefox
• Version: Latest

Additional context

This issue is related to PR #150

This is what it should look like:

[prathameshbhalekar]

Can I work on it if approved?

[iamkryptonite]

Can I work on it if approved?

Sure, just wait for it to be approved. Meanwhile you can go through pr #150 because this issue is related to it.

[nandini45]

@iamkryptonite yeah i will approve this issue.
@prathameshbhalekar do u want to work on it?

[prathameshbhalekar]

@iamkryptonite yeah i will approve this issue.
@prathameshbhalekar do u want to work on it?

Yeah but my exams are going on right now so I'll need a week to work on it.

[nandini45]

@prathameshbhalekar i will assign you it but it will be still available.
if anyone comes and ask for the work i will assign that person
if after a week still no one works on it
you can work it
sounds good?

[nlok5923]

@nandini45 can i take this issue.

[nandini45]

@nlok5923 ok

[iamkryptonite]

@nlok5923 I have updated the issue with what the 'timeline' should look like. What you need to do is adjust the positions according to the current date and month. If you need any help please ask.

[nlok5923]

thanks @iamkryptonite working on it.

[Rahulm2310]

@keshakaneria Can you please remove the Available label here and other issues wherever a contributor is assigned so that it isn't misleading for contributors.