Regarding summarisation for title generation #3
QuietRocket
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for your message! There are several points to note about title-summarisation:
Making the feature optional is great and I will put it into roadmap. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First off, I'd like to say great job on the featv2 revamp! And I like how it's now its own separate repository. Great work 👏
While reading the code, I noticed there's a functionality to update the conversation title based on the prompt.
I find this feature to be pretty nifty, but wouldn't it be good to make it optional? I just glazed over the repo, but it seems to me like if I use GPT-4, the summary will be made via GPT-4. This consists of its own request copying the prompt and possibly the entire conversation history. It seems like it will chew through API credits pretty quickly.
If I understood this situation correctly, and this indeed could be an issue, there could be two possible fixes:
Looking forward to your response,
QuietRocket
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions