Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider a package each for Decimal64 and Decimal128 #20

Open
anzdaddy opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Consider a package each for Decimal64 and Decimal128 #20

anzdaddy opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
🔌 api design Issues related to the design of the API.

Comments

@anzdaddy
Copy link
Member

anzdaddy commented Feb 1, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Having to suffix every name with 64 is annoying. Should we have a decimal64 package (and therefore decimal128) instead?

The counterargument is that most users will have to use the suffix regardless, whether it's on the typename or the package name, so it's really only a headache for the maintainers.
@anzdaddy anzdaddy added the 🔌 api design Issues related to the design of the API. label Feb 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🔌 api design Issues related to the design of the API.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@anzdaddy