Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] ostest fails without returning the expected exit code #14749

Open
1 task done
tmedicci opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 9 comments
Open
1 task done

[BUG] ostest fails without returning the expected exit code #14749

tmedicci opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
Arch: xtensa Issues related to the Xtensa architecture Area: Applications Issues related to Applications OS: Linux Issues related to Linux (building system, etc) Type: Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@tmedicci
Copy link
Contributor

Description / Steps to reproduce the issue

In addition to the errors reported at #14722 (comment), there is an even critical issue regarding ostest for ESP32-S3 (and, eventually, for other archs): it fails without returning any error code after applying this PR.

How to Reproduce

Build/flash NuttX f2aeb5e56ff6ec7ba15958403289e462a8c84ab8 with Apps 0c467dc02d1f03f3f9f3defb16f36cb4f53b4c9d, with:

make -j distclean && ./tools/configure.sh esp32s3-devkit:smp && make flash EXTRAFLAGS="-Wno-cpp -Werror" ESPTOOL_BINDIR=./ ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/ttyUSB0 -s -j$(nproc)

And run ostest :

signest_test: Simple case:
  Total signalled 1240  Odd=620 Even=620
  Total handled   1240  Odd=620 Even=620
  Total nested    3    Odd=3   Even=0  
signest_test: With task locking
  Total signalled 2480  Odd=1240 Even=1240
  Total handled   2480  Odd=1240 Even=1240
  Total nested    3    Odd=3   Even=0  
signest_test: With intefering thread
[CPU0] dump_assert_info: Current Version: NuttX  10.4.0 f2aeb5e56f-dirty Nov 12 2024 16:46:29 xtensa
[CPU0] dump_assert_info: Assertion failed (_Bool)0: at file: signest.c:555 task(CPU0): ostest process: ostest 0x420470
[CPU0] up_dump_register:    PC: 4204767e    PS: 00060322
[CPU0] up_dump_register:    A0: 80377b9d    A1: 3fc942e0    A2: 00000000    A3: 3fc8c7a0
[CPU0] up_dump_register:    A4: 20000000    A5: 3fc8b284    A6: 00000004    A7: 00000000
[CPU0] up_dump_register:    A8: 3fc8c778    A9: 3fc942d0   A10: 3fc8c778   A11: 00000000
[CPU0] up_dump_register:   A12: 3c0104bb   A13: 3fc943d0   A14: 00000004   A15: 00000000
[CPU0] up_dump_register:   SAR: 00000020 CAUSE: 3fc941d0 VADDR: 3fc941d0
[CPU0] up_dump_register:  LBEG: 40056f08  LEND: 40056f12  LCNT: 00000000
[CPU0] dump_stackinfo: User Stack:
[CPU0] dump_stackinfo:   base: 0x3fc92530
[CPU0] dump_stackinfo:   size: 00008112
[CPU0] dump_stackinfo:     sp: 0x3fc942e0
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc942c0: 82035d11 3fc94300 3c01a9cf 3fc92070 00001fb0 3fc944e0 3c01a9cf 3fc92070
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc942e0: 3fc8b3dc 3fc942e0 00000000 00000000 8204a960 3fc943f0 3c01a9cf 0000022b
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94300: 00000000 3fc9211c 3fc9211c 42047f20 7474754e 3fc90058 00060a22 3fc92070
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94320: 3fc943f0 3fc900d0 00000004 00000000 82050da2 3fc94370 3fc92240 3c01ad51
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94340: 3fc94390 2e303100 00302e34 3fc8b288 3fc943f0 3fc943d0 32660004 35626561
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94360: 66363565 7269642d 4e207974 3120766f 30322032 31203432 36343a36 0039323a
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94380: 3fc92240 3fc943c0 00000025 65747840 0061736e 3fc943d0 00000004 00000004
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc943a0: 3fc943f0 3fc92070 3fc8c7a0 3c010a10 3c01a9cf 0000022b 00000003 00000744
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc943c0: 00000006 00060320 0000022b 00000000 3c010a10 3fc8c7a0 3c015f54 42047f20
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc943e0: 820481fe 3fc94410 00000003 00000744 3c010a10 00000000 00000003 0000026c
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94400: 82036061 3fc94460 00000000 3fc92504 00010066 00000000 00000000 00002000
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94420: 00000036 00000035 00000066 3fc92504 00000003 00058828 0000e428 0000002c
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94440: 00000744 3fc8cc90 00000000 00000e88 82033920 3fc944a0 42047f20 00000005
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94460: 0005fc38 00000001 0000001f 0005a948 000052f0 0005a948 00005458 00000000
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc94480: 00000004 3fc8cbdc 3c017b1a 3fc9251e 00000000 3fc944c0 00000000 42047f20
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc944a0: 3fc924f0 3fc92070 3fc8a2cc 00000002 00000000 3fc944e0 00000000 00000000
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc944c0: 00050020 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[CPU0] stack_dump: 0x3fc944e0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
  Total signalled 3720  Odd=1860 Even=1860
  Total handled   3720  Odd=1860 Even=1860
  Total nested    3    Odd=3   Even=0  
signest_test: ERROR 3 ODD signals were nested
ostest_main: Exiting with status 256
nsh> echo $?
0

The firmware asserted, but the return code of ostest is still 0! This assertion occurs only with this firmware version. So, there are two open questions to be investigated: why is this test asserting after this PR and why ostest returns 0 even after assertion.

On which OS does this issue occur?

[OS: Linux]

What is the version of your OS?

Manjaro

NuttX Version

f2aeb5e

Issue Architecture

[Arch: xtensa]

Issue Area

[Area: Applications]

Verification

  • I have verified before submitting the report.
@tmedicci tmedicci added the Type: Bug Something isn't working label Nov 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Arch: xtensa Issues related to the Xtensa architecture Area: Applications Issues related to Applications OS: Linux Issues related to Linux (building system, etc) labels Nov 12, 2024
yamt added a commit to yamt/incubator-nuttx that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 13, 2024

@tmedicci
i have a question.

ostest on esp32s3-devkit:smp doesn't work reliably for me, even with the change in question reverted.
it often hangs at seemingly random places. i have run it several times and it passed only once.

does it work better for you?

xiaoxiang781216 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 13, 2024

@tmedicci i have a question.

ostest on esp32s3-devkit:smp doesn't work reliably for me, even with the change in question reverted. it often hangs at seemingly random places. i have run it several times and it passed only once.

does it work better for you?

it seems it was because of an unrelated issue.
#14755

@tmedicci
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tmedicci i have a question.

ostest on esp32s3-devkit:smp doesn't work reliably for me, even with the change in question reverted. it often hangs at seemingly random places. i have run it several times and it passed only once.

does it work better for you?

Hi @yamt , there were nested issues pending. I reported that ostest was failing because a recent change, but it seems to be fixed recently. Now (with #14751), the test runs successfully: apache/nuttx-apps#2737 (comment)

@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 14, 2024

@tmedicci i have a question.
ostest on esp32s3-devkit:smp doesn't work reliably for me, even with the change in question reverted. it often hangs at seemingly random places. i have run it several times and it passed only once.
does it work better for you?

Hi @yamt , there were nested issues pending. I reported that ostest was failing because a recent change, but it seems to be fixed recently. Now (with #14751), the test runs successfully: apache/nuttx-apps#2737 (comment)

do you mean you have no idea how reliably it successes?

@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 14, 2024

i've run the test several times, with and without an equivalent of #14722.
(i enabled assertions)
i couldn't reproduced the reported symptom.

@tmedicci
Copy link
Contributor Author

i've run the test several times, with and without an equivalent of #14722. (i enabled assertions) i couldn't reproduced the reported symptom.

Did you test with the exact references of nuttx and nuttx-apps repos I reported?

@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 15, 2024

i've run the test several times, with and without an equivalent of #14722. (i enabled assertions) i couldn't reproduced the reported symptom.

Did you test with the exact references of nuttx and nuttx-apps repos I reported?

yes. at least a few times.

@yamt
Copy link
Contributor

yamt commented Nov 15, 2024

i suspect #14807 can explain the symptom. how do you think?

@tmedicci
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anyway, it seems we have an issue with ostest itself. Even failing one of the tests (and printing its exit code), it still returns 0 for the ostest app. That said, I think I can edit the title and remove its relation with esp32s3-devkit:smp.

Internally, we add a check for the log messages to fail in case of non-zero return code.

@tmedicci tmedicci changed the title [BUG] esp32s3-devkit:smp's ostest fails without warning after #14722 [BUG] ostest fails without returning the expected exit code Nov 19, 2024
JaeheeKwon pushed a commit to JaeheeKwon/nuttx that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Arch: xtensa Issues related to the Xtensa architecture Area: Applications Issues related to Applications OS: Linux Issues related to Linux (building system, etc) Type: Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants