Skip to content

Rationalize features that are in parquet-format but don't have entry on implementation status #192

Description

@alamb

While working on #189 @emkornfield noticed there are several features that are in parquet-format but don't have entry on implementation status: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189/changes#r3470611445

Honestly I think most of these are so old, that it doesn't necessary add value, other then maybe providing a note on that page? Is there anything worth surfacing?

Looking more closely, these seem to be the modern ones:

  • logical-variant-shredding - should be covered under variant type support? But maybe called out separately
  • format-geospatial-statistics - should be covered under geospatial support? But maybe called out separately
  • format-binary-protocol-extensions - Not clear if this is actually something on its own without a defined footer we want to use?
  • format-ieee-754-total-order-and-nan-counts - This should be added (and we would ideally add a 2026 feature column for read support).

Originally posted by @emkornfield in #189 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions