For some reason, Scala 2 seems to allow public access to package private constructors but Scala 3 enforces it.
We also had to relax the scope on 2 constructors to allow pekko-connectors to compile with Scala 3.
#178
It turns out that Tapir also uses these exact same constructors but Tapir is in its own package. Tapir recently added Pekko HTTP support but didn't add Scala 3 support for Pekko HTTP (softwaremill/tapir#3114).
Should we start making these constructors (see #178) public?
If so, should we backport to 1.0.1 even though this will probably affect binary compatibility?
Adding a hacky org.apache.pekko scoped util class to Tapir should allow a workaround that can create Content-Length/Content-Type instances.
wdyt? @jrudolph @mdedetrich
For some reason, Scala 2 seems to allow public access to package private constructors but Scala 3 enforces it.
We also had to relax the scope on 2 constructors to allow pekko-connectors to compile with Scala 3.
#178
It turns out that Tapir also uses these exact same constructors but Tapir is in its own package. Tapir recently added Pekko HTTP support but didn't add Scala 3 support for Pekko HTTP (softwaremill/tapir#3114).
Should we start making these constructors (see #178) public?
If so, should we backport to 1.0.1 even though this will probably affect binary compatibility?
Adding a hacky org.apache.pekko scoped util class to Tapir should allow a workaround that can create Content-Length/Content-Type instances.
wdyt? @jrudolph @mdedetrich