Replies: 3 comments
-
As far to have a (how do they say it) 'whole abstraction' it's indeed something to have both. But I'm not an expert in APIM and certificates used within that context, so I can't bring much added value to the usefulness for this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Certainly! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Okay, will be turning this into an "issue" then! Thanks to both for the feedback! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Would it - in order to be complete - make sense to provide an additional function next to the one specified in #134 , to also provide the capability to upload a private certificate in the APIM Certificate store?
Although the actions required are far less complex than uploading a public certificate in the CA Certificate store:
(see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/az.apimanagement/new-azapimanagementcertificate?view=azps-5.5.0)
This would have the same parameters + 1 additional:
It would offer a complete set allowing users to upload both private and public certificate via 1 Arcus-library.
cc: @stijnmoreels , @tomkerkhove
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions