-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate git-vote to get better automation around TSC voting and easy to calculate participation #1093
Comments
workflows should be easy to do as we already have experience with handling in workflow concepts like:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aasyncapi%2F.github%20comment&type=code |
@derberg I am interested in this issue, also have experience in workflow in the past we used in the generator issue thanks asyncapi/generator#538 |
Bounty Issue's service commentText labels: @asyncapi/bounty_team |
@derberg I have started working on my own repo for testing AayushSaini101/Vote#1 here is the sample, We just need to add configuration for the allowed users and command. |
@AayushSaini101 ok, assigned the issue to you. Please go ahead |
We can have automation around voting too like changes in Furthermore, we can have multiple profiles as well:-
WDYT? @derberg Also, should we add the profile for the whole organisation or just this repo ? |
Bounty Issue's Timeline
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline. |
@Shurtu-gal at the moment we officially have only something like TSC voting also, codeowners changes are not a subject for voting for TSC but only repo maintainers decision |
we still need to get #1155 merged first |
@aeworxet fyi bounty completed |
Bounty Issue Completed 🎉@AayushSaini101, please go to the AsyncAPI page on Open Collective and submit an invoice for |
https://github.com/cncf/gitvote is already installed in our organization, for
community
repoThere is one problem here - I don't think it supports discussions. But also I don't think it is a big problem. We can still use discussions to discuss stuff, and then use PR/issue for final voting, depending on the case.
config for
.gitvote.yml
that would have to be introduced:outcome should be:
/vote
comment, it adds a label to the issue/PR so later it is easier to track record of votes. When/cancel-vote
is added, we should remove the label.vote-passed
orvote-did-not-pass
whenevergit-vote
bot adds related commentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: