Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve ARTS surface properties integration in Disort and RT4 #83

Open
olemke opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Improve ARTS surface properties integration in Disort and RT4 #83

olemke opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@erikssonpatrick
Labels
enhancement Iterations on existing features
Milestone
ARTS 3

Comments

@olemke
Copy link
Member

olemke commented Sep 25, 2019 •
edited
Loading

  • Implement consistent treatment of surface between RT4 and Disort.
  • Possibly utilize BRDF support offered by C Disort to implement non-Lambertian surfaces.

Can be started after PR #80 is merged.
@olemke olemke added the enhancement Iterations on existing features label Sep 25, 2019
@olemke olemke changed the title Add non-Lambertian surface support to cdisort interface Improve ARTS surface properties integration in Disort and RT4 Sep 25, 2019
@erikssonpatrick erikssonpatrick self-assigned this Oct 11, 2019
@erikssonpatrick
Copy link
Contributor

Probably done for RT4, and I have given up on DISORT for now. But status of code needs to be revised..

@erikssonpatrick erikssonpatrick mentioned this issue Sep 18, 2020
Open
@olemke olemke added this to the ARTS 3 milestone Sep 18, 2020
@dhjx1996
Copy link

dhjx1996 commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Probably done for RT4, and I have given up on DISORT for now. But status of code needs to be revised..

How is DISORT going?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@erikssonpatrick erikssonpatrick

Labels
enhancement Iterations on existing features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
ARTS 3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@olemke @erikssonpatrick @dhjx1996