Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Impedance boundary condition for wave port mode solve #265

Open
sebastiangrimberg opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Impedance boundary condition for wave port mode solve #265

sebastiangrimberg opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
driven Related to driven simulations in the frequency domain enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sebastiangrimberg
Copy link
Contributor

Current the eigenmode solve for wave ports supports only PEC (homogenous Dirichlet) or PMC (natural) boundary conditions. It inherits these from the parent 3D model, but this can lead to confusion when a 3D model surface has an impedance BC (conductivity, surface impedance, absorbing) and that does not get correctly handled by the wave port automatically. The current expectation is that the user can manually chose whether an impedance boundary maps to a PEC or PMC BC in the wave port using the "WavePortPEC" object, but this might be overly complex and correctly supporting impedance BCs in the 2D mode solve should not be too difficult.

This might help issues like #264 tries to solve in the future.

@sebastiangrimberg sebastiangrimberg added enhancement New feature or request driven Related to driven simulations in the frequency domain labels Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
driven Related to driven simulations in the frequency domain enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant