July 2020

[JLHwung]

https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2020/07.md

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2054 has consensus. I quickly tests it in our REPL and I think we'll have to update our parser.

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2057 has consensus. It doesn't directly affect us.

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2062 has not consensus. eval?.() is indirect eval, and we should update our implementation.

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2090 will not change. 09.1_1 and 09e1_1 are still allowed in loose mode (we need to fix our parser).

[nicolo-ribaudo]

https://tc39.es/proposal-class-static-block/ did not have consensus for Stage 2.

[ljharb]

(note: yet, because it wasn't added to the agenda before the deadline, so there wasn't sufficient time to review)

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2086 didn't have consensus, it needs to be discussed more.

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma402#471 has consensus.

[nicolo-ribaudo]

Promise.any & AggregateError is Stage 4 🎉

[nicolo-ribaudo]

tc39/ecma262#2094 has consensus.