We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lib/cloudwatch/sender/base.rb line 8 => @InfluxDB = InfluxDB::Client.new "graphite",
It takes the graphite as the database name. But we have influx_database option to give the database name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why is this issue closed? AFAICT, the problem still exists. "graphite" is still hard-coded into base.rb.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@jpriebe I'm not sure why I closed this issue. Reopening again after your verification.
Do we have any updates related to this issue ? I am also facing the same issue .Any write-up on how was this issue fixed will be helpful
No branches or pull requests
lib/cloudwatch/sender/base.rb line 8 => @InfluxDB = InfluxDB::Client.new "graphite",
It takes the graphite as the database name. But we have influx_database option to give the database name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: