Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documents the assumptions on plugins versioning #7

Open
simonedavico opened this issue Jul 8, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Documents the assumptions on plugins versioning #7

simonedavico opened this issue Jul 8, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@simonedavico
Copy link
Collaborator

simonedavico commented Jul 8, 2016

We need to have some assumptions on the format of the versions, if we want to recognise version ranges.

We decided to support semantic versioning to recognise version ranges, since it's an established and commonly used versioning format.

For plugins of S.U.T.s that don't use the semver format, we allow the specification of an arbitrary version string. Nevertheless, we don't provide version ranges support for versioning formats different from server.

Refer also to: #6 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants