You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently every single validator node optimistically sends a build over the engine API for every single slot. This workload can be greatly reduced by only optimistically building if the validator thinks it is going to be the next proposer.
There needs to be a feasibility analysis done to determine the consistency of determining when a validator is going to be the next proposer. Additionally, this needs to ensure proper calculation under faulty conditions. For example, we must be able to determine the next proposer accurately (and trigger timely builds) when there are multiple failed rounds for a slot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently every single validator node optimistically sends a build over the engine API for every single slot. This workload can be greatly reduced by only optimistically building if the validator thinks it is going to be the next proposer.
There needs to be a feasibility analysis done to determine the consistency of determining when a validator is going to be the next proposer. Additionally, this needs to ensure proper calculation under faulty conditions. For example, we must be able to determine the next proposer accurately (and trigger timely builds) when there are multiple failed rounds for a slot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: