Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine Sample with Enriched Modification #53

Open
max-vdL opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Determine Sample with Enriched Modification #53

max-vdL opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@max-vdL
Copy link

max-vdL commented Nov 24, 2023

Hi, I’m currently working with the Master of Pores 2 to detect RNA modifications. In my analysis, I need to determine which of the two samples being compared has an enrichment of modified RNA at position X.

However, in the final output, I only receive information about differences at the supported k-mer positions. In epinano does indicate the enrichment trend toward a specific sample, but I haven’t found such an indication in nanoconsensus or nanoposish/compore.

Have you encountered this issue before or found a way to extract sample specific enrichment information?

@lucacozzuto
Copy link
Member

@ADelgadoT

@ADelgadoT
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Max,

As you mention, NanoConsensus and Nanocompore only give qualitative information (ie: which regions are differentially modified between samples) and they do not give information regarding the directionality of the change.

To obtain this information, you should either:

  • Option 1 (recommended): look at epinano summed errors
  • Option 2: check the results of tombo msc - they contain information about % methylated reads per position - and therefore, it could give you an idea of the directionality.

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants