From 8d6b33c2120dbdd42ef404a24c81c123fcb1fa24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Tapley Hoyt Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:42:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update __init__.py --- src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py b/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py index fb4dd97..179bf00 100644 --- a/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py +++ b/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ class PredictionTuple(NamedTuple): """ confidence: float """An assessment of the confidence of the mapping, reported by the method used to generate it. - + This means that confidence values aren't generally comparable, though they should follow the rough standard that closer to 1 is more confident and closer to 0 is less confident. @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ class PredictionTuple(NamedTuple): 1. The Gilda match score, inspired by https://aclanthology.org/W15-3801/. Section 5.2 of the `supplementary material for the Gilda paper `_ - describes this score in detail, where 1.0 is best and 0 is worst. + describes this score in detail, where 1.0 is best and 0 is worst. https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings/blob/master/scripts/generate_agrovoc_mappings.py is an example that uses this variant. 2. A high-level estimation of the precision of the scores generated by the given script.