@sosna @stratosn Please review the membership of @albertohernandez1995, seems he is not allowed to push

@javihern98 the invitation to @albertohernandez1995 was sent last Monday, but it is still pending.
@albertohernandez1995 can you check, please?

Hi @albertohernandez1995 can you check here: https://github.com/settings/organizations
The invitation should be there.
If not, we can send a new one.

Hi @stratosn all good now, thanks!

@sosna @stratosn Would you have somewhere a data file that references a Provision Agreement for testing?

<message:Structure structureID="AAA"
                   namespace="urn:dummy"
                   dimensionAtObservation="AllDimensions">
    <common:ProvisionAgrement>
        ....................................
    </common:ProvisionAgrement>
</message:Structure>

Hi @javihern98, do you need an example on how to reference a Provision Agreement or the actual data file with the related Structures?

Ok, then we need to prepare something from scratch, but if you already have a dataset that references a Dataflow, then the changes should not be a lot.

Sorry cannot see the file on GH. Maybe you could upload using the UI, or simply send it to me by email.

Sorry @stratosn , please find it here (changed externsion to TXT to upload it correctly):

BIS_DER_DATAFLOW.txt

Thanks, @javihern98
This file can easily refer to the Provision Agreement, only by changing the header <message:Structure> content, ie:

        <message:Structure structureID="BIS_WEBSTATS_DER_DATAFLOW_1_0"
                           namespace="urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=BIS:WEBSTATS_DER_DATAFLOW(1.0):ObsLevelDim:TIME_PERIOD"
                           dimensionAtObservation="AllDimensions">
            <common:ProvisionAgrement>
                <Ref agencyID="BIS" id="WEBSTATS_DER_DATAFLOW_PRA" version="1.0"/>
            </common:ProvisionAgrement>
        </message:Structure>

Note that the 2.1 schemas include a typo (ProvisionAgrement instead of ProvisionAgreement)

Of course, this is the only change directly impacted by the referencing, but if you wanted to make it more meaningful, it might be useful to consider further Constraints.
If you need something more on that, please let me know.