trigger build 3

Author: jrakibi

scalingbitcoin/hong-kong-2015/a-bevy-of-block-size-proposals-bip100-bip102-and-more.md

@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ A: That's reasonable. You are going to be rolling out a patch, which says 6 mont
 
 Q: In one of those slides, you said 75% levels, so 750 out of 1000 blocks. That was bip101. What is your optimal choice for that? Is it 75% 80% 90%?
 
+
 A: That's why we're leaning towards flag day with non-binding miner voting. It's to avoid picking a specific number. You want to have a clear majority of hashpower on the fork that users prefer. I don't want to pick a number. I don't have a number. It's just a supermajority of the hashpower. That's step 2. But step 1 is the users agreeing by running the new software.
 
 Q: Would you break SPV clients in a hard-fork?