Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bitnami/rabbitmq] Use of clustering.rebalance is not documented properly #31392

Open
utkarshmani1997 opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@utkarshmani1997
Copy link

utkarshmani1997 commented Jan 16, 2025

Name and Version

bitnami/rabbitmq 15.2.3

What is the problem this feature will solve?

There are a few instances of cluster.rebalance in the chart but it's not clear how and where is this flag really used.
I found an instance where we are only setting the env RABBITMQ_CLUSTER_REBALANCE to true, but where exactly is this env variable used?
I want to understand its effect on Quorum Queues and whether it is required or not.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

Having a clear comment on this flag about its uses will help in understanding its use cases and whether it is required or not in Quorum Queues.

@carrodher
Copy link
Member

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We appreciate your involvement! If you're interested in contributing a solution, we welcome you to create a pull request. The Bitnami team is excited to review your submission and offer feedback. You can find the contributing guidelines here.

Your contribution will greatly benefit the community. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need assistance.

@utkarshmani1997
Copy link
Author

utkarshmani1997 commented Jan 16, 2025

Thanks @carrodher i am happy to contribute. But, i would like to understand how its getting used. We can discuss the approach regarding the same.

@javsalgar javsalgar changed the title Use of clustering.rebalance is not documented properly [bitnami/rabbitmq] Use of clustering.rebalance is not documented properly Jan 17, 2025
@utkarshmani1997
Copy link
Author

@javsalgar @carrodher any updates on the above query?

@javsalgar
Copy link
Contributor

@utkarshmani1997
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the quick turnaround. I will update the comments about its uses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants