You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, vikos is fitting its models by online algorithms, one event at a time. This is quite similar to vowpal wabbit.
Vowpal Wabbit (VW) project is a fast out-of-core learning system sponsored by Microsoft Research and (previously) Yahoo! Research. Source
Vowpal wabbit is also fitting Logistic or Linear Regression Models. It would be interesting to compare both projects in terms of speed or design decisions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MaxBenChrist
changed the title
Compare to vowpal wabbit
Compare vikos to vowpal wabbit
Sep 22, 2016
I did not find the time for an in depth comparison yet, however here are my findings from the first quick look:
Commonalities:
Cost function is changeable
Model is changeable
SGD based training algorithm (more sophisticated than current implementations in vikos)
Differences:
Is simply more mature in terms of features
provides functionality for regularization
It's generic capabilities are far inferior to vikos. Since it's written in C++ which forces it to make a lot more decisions at runtime to still be usable without type inference. However, because of this it can also provide a really handy command line interface.
cost function for binary classifiers rather use -1..1 instead of 0..1 used by Vikos. I can not say if this choice is arbitrary or has a significant advantage. I choose 0..1 for its easy interpretation as a probability.
At the moment, vikos is fitting its models by online algorithms, one event at a time. This is quite similar to vowpal wabbit.
Vowpal wabbit is also fitting Logistic or Linear Regression Models. It would be interesting to compare both projects in terms of speed or design decisions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: