LICENSE naming and mistake

[bandirevanth]

LICENSE naming and mistake

Hello team,

I noticed that this repository currently includes two different license files:

• Apache-2.0.txt
• MIT-LICENSE.txt

Concerns

1. The license files are named with .txt extensions. While not incorrect, the standard convention is to use:
   • LICENSE
2. In the Apache 2.0 license file, the copyright line still contains placeholder text:
   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]

This should be updated with the correct project details to avoid ambiguity.

Why This Matters

Clear licensing ensures that contributors and users know the terms under which the project may be used, modified, or redistributed.

Thank you for your time and for maintaining this project!