You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The pin headers for the ST-LINK programming are taller than the surrounding connections.
I have a Voron 2.4 and I use the Huvud board on the X/Y (A/B) motors.
If the gantry is crooked (which can happen if the printer is off and you lean on the back gantry rail like an idiot)...
and you go to home, you can crash the back rail into the bottom plate.
Since the pins of the header are the highest point, they impact first and they bend.
Picture below was AFTER I had straightened most of them, they were essentially bent down on top of each other.
I'm shocked I didn't fry the board by shorting power and ground.
Next iteration maybe use a 90 degree header so these pins aren't the first thing to hit if a stepper goes too low?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a suggestion for a future iteration.
The pin headers for the ST-LINK programming are taller than the surrounding connections.
I have a Voron 2.4 and I use the Huvud board on the X/Y (A/B) motors.
If the gantry is crooked (which can happen if the printer is off and you lean on the back gantry rail like an idiot)...
and you go to home, you can crash the back rail into the bottom plate.
Since the pins of the header are the highest point, they impact first and they bend.
Picture below was AFTER I had straightened most of them, they were essentially bent down on top of each other.
I'm shocked I didn't fry the board by shorting power and ground.
Next iteration maybe use a 90 degree header so these pins aren't the first thing to hit if a stepper goes too low?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: