You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as units is meant for scientific calculation I'd think that it would be a great benefit to use the highest possible accuracy for the definition. Right now the accuracy will cause significant error over time, when for instance when stepping an integration that uses this conversion for the angles.
It seems like units doesn't have it's own constants definitions, so maybe we should just use the value from the math/constants here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just noticed that the degree definition in
boost/units/base_units/angle/degree.hpp
uses quite inaccurate value:as units is meant for scientific calculation I'd think that it would be a great benefit to use the highest possible accuracy for the definition. Right now the accuracy will cause significant error over time, when for instance when stepping an integration that uses this conversion for the angles.
It seems like units doesn't have it's own constants definitions, so maybe we should just use the value from the math/constants here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: