You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running mop may disrupt workflows that are currently running, so today one needs to ensure everything is quiet before running it.
While this is not an issue for workspaces you want to mothball, it means you cannot run it asynchronously as part of a cron job (or Google Cloud Scheduler job).
One way to do that might be to only delete objects created older than a certain age. Eg as tasks are limited to 7 days, and people tend to not like really long workflows, limiting the purge to objects created > 10 days ago will likely avoid clobbering a running pipeline. If the user knows the pipelines are all much shorter, a shorter timeframe could be selected. A longer timeframe, eg 60 days, might be chosen if they want to ensure call caching on their current project would not be impacted.
Tighter coupling between mop and the Cromwell/Terra databases might offer a cleaner solution, but if that's too complicated the easier solution above would still be an improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Running mop may disrupt workflows that are currently running, so today one needs to ensure everything is quiet before running it.
While this is not an issue for workspaces you want to mothball, it means you cannot run it asynchronously as part of a cron job (or Google Cloud Scheduler job).
One way to do that might be to only delete objects created older than a certain age. Eg as tasks are limited to 7 days, and people tend to not like really long workflows, limiting the purge to objects created > 10 days ago will likely avoid clobbering a running pipeline. If the user knows the pipelines are all much shorter, a shorter timeframe could be selected. A longer timeframe, eg 60 days, might be chosen if they want to ensure call caching on their current project would not be impacted.
Tighter coupling between mop and the Cromwell/Terra databases might offer a cleaner solution, but if that's too complicated the easier solution above would still be an improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: