Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure 2 Discussion #21

Open
gwaybio opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Figure 2 Discussion #21

gwaybio opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@gwaybio
Copy link
Member

gwaybio commented Jul 5, 2021

figure2

Figure 2. Comparing Cell Painting and L1000 readouts of compound perturbations by mechanism of action (MOA). (a) Median replicate correlation of compounds measured in both assays compared across doses. The color of the point represents how often the compound perturbation is reproducible across doses and assays. The maximum count is 12 (6 doses x 2 assays). (b) Median correlation between compounds annotated to the same MOA. We derived the null threshold through a nonparametric permutation test of randomly sampled compounds (see methods). The size of the points represent how many compounds belong to the MOA class. (c) All 31 MOAs that are consistently measured by either Cell Painting or L1000 in three or more doses. The larger the text, the more reproducible doses per MOA.

@gwaybio gwaybio mentioned this issue Jul 5, 2021
gwaybio added a commit to gwaybio/lincs-profiling-comparison that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant