Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure 5 Discussion #28

Open
gwaybio opened this issue Jul 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Figure 5 Discussion #28

gwaybio opened this issue Jul 9, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@gwaybio
Copy link
Member

gwaybio commented Jul 9, 2021

figure5

Figure 5. Predicting compound mechanisms of action (MOA) in Cell Painting and L1000 reveals complimentary performance for different mechanisms. (a) Test set model performance metrics for the multi-label, multi-class prediction framework. We trained models from a recent Kaggle competition plus a K nearest neighbors baseline model. The dotted bar chart represents a negative control in which we trained models with shuffled labels. The solid lines indicate ensemble model performance by blending model predictions (see methods). (b) Individual MOA performance by area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) in the top performing model using Cell Painting and L1000 data. The dotted grey lines indicate a negative control baseline. We report all performance metrics using test set profiles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant