You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Comparing the distribution of median scores between L1000 and Lincs Cell painting Consensus datasets
- Major points
213 MOAs (Mechanism of actions) present in both Cell painting and L1000 Level-5 data are compared based on the distribution of their median scores.
During alignment of MOAs in L1000 with the MOAS in Cell painting, I realized that MOAs found in the same broad sample in both L1000 & Cell painting data are partly named differently i.e. the naming of same MOAS in both are not consistent.
Results -- MODZ Consensus dataset
Scatter plot btw L1000 vs Lincs Cell Painting median scores per dose
Median scores in cell painting data are more spread out and have more extreme median values than L1000 data.
Distribution of median scores in L1000 and Cell Painting Data per dose
Distribution on a dose-by-dose basis
- I am still trying to figure out the reason behind the relationship between the p-value and median scores (null distribution) in #2 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Cell Painting gets more MOAs "right" and more MOAs "wrong" than L100
Only a handful of MOAs have really strong groups in L1000
Dose doesn't really impact things all that much
A couple things to keep in mind:
we know that MOA annotations are wrong - thinking that they aren't will hurt us trying to interpret these results
It makes sense to me that morphology will group things more tightly than gene expression. There are many ways to alter a gene expression profile that can manifest into similar morphology.
I am most interested in following up on some groups of MOAs that are bad in one tech and good in the other (the off-diagonal)👇
I am pasting @AdeboyeML's analysis performed in #2 (comment) so that we can continue a targeted discussion in a clean github issue:
@shntnu @gwaygenomics
Comparing the distribution of median scores between L1000 and Lincs Cell painting Consensus datasets
- Major points
213 MOAs (Mechanism of actions) present in both Cell painting and L1000 Level-5 data are compared based on the distribution of their median scores.
During alignment of MOAs in L1000 with the MOAS in Cell painting, I realized that MOAs found in the same broad sample in both L1000 & Cell painting data are partly named differently i.e. the naming of same MOAS in both are not consistent.
Results -- MODZ Consensus dataset
Scatter plot btw L1000 vs Lincs Cell Painting median scores per dose
Distribution of median scores in L1000 and Cell Painting Data per dose
Distribution on a dose-by-dose basis
- I am still trying to figure out the reason behind the relationship between the p-value and median scores (null distribution) in #2 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: