AI Integration #31
Replies: 12 comments 7 replies
|
a local description database is pretty much out of the question 😄 i might enable the optional AI explanation feature for everyone in the next Insider build though |
|
Totally understandable 💯 |
|
feel free to test it in the current Insider build happy to discuss feedback here or on X as well |
|
Thanks! Good implementation |
|
hank you for the further development. Would it also be possible to implement the Google Gemini API? You can get an API key for free here as well. |
|
It would be even better if an OpenAI-compatible API could be used. I have plenty of code plan, but I’m unable to register for Groq to use them. |
|
I thought there was a bug but it looks like OpenAI keys are not supported (yet) so I second @xzhlksh --- when possible it would be nice to be able to use it since some of us are already setup in OpenAI for multiple projects. |
|
same,OpenAI-compatible API is better,so that i can use other opensource models for ai explain |
|
@imtipi @spmet-apps @xzhlksh do you mean a custom openai compatible endpoint for services like ollama, lm studio, openrouter, or a self-hosted model? fluentcleaner already supports groq, openai, and anthropic directly, so i just want to make sure this is what youre looking for #115 |
|
I'd really like to see support for inputting your own Gemini API key. They always seem to be the last option for developers to support, ironically over OpenAI |
|
I'm using Groq. Fluent Cleaner (Modern) says the API key is invalid, but the same key works when I manually call the Groq API from PowerShell (e.g. GET /openai/v1/models). |






Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I can imagine that AI is a controversial topic. But I would actually appreciate it if the entries were explained in a bit more detail.
Maybe that could be added even without AI?
All reactions