You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yonghong Song says:
====================
This patch set added name checking for PTR, ARRAY, VOLATILE, TYPEDEF,
CONST, RESTRICT, STRUCT, UNION, ENUM and FWD types. Such a strict
name checking makes BTF more sound in the kernel and future
BTF-to-header-file converesion ([1]) less fragile.
Patch #1 implemented btf_name_valid_identifier() for name checking
which will be used in Patch #2.
Patch #2 checked name validity for the above mentioned types.
Patch #3 fixed two existing test_btf unit tests exposed by the strict
name checking.
Patch #4 added additional test cases.
This patch set is against bpf tree.
Patch #1 has been implemented in bpf-next commit
Commit 2667a26 ("bpf: btf: Add BTF_KIND_FUNC
and BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO"), so there is no need to apply this
patch to bpf-next. In case this patch is applied to bpf-next,
there will be a minor conflict like
diff --cc kernel/bpf/btf.c
index a09b2f94ab25,93c233ab2db6..000000000000
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@@ -474,7 -451,7 +474,11 @@@ static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(c
return !*src;
}
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+const char *btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
++=======
+ static const char *btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
++>>>>>>> fa9566b0847d... bpf: btf: implement btf_name_valid_identifier()
{
if (!offset)
return "(anon)";
Just resolve the conflict by taking the "const char ..." line.
Patches #2, #3 and #4 can be applied to bpf-next without conflict.
[1]: http://vger.kernel.org/lpc-bpf2018.html#session-2
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
0 commit comments