You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think you're right and this should clearly generalize to logical expression as well: 'express1 logical_operator express2' for instance 'AA+BB<C*C'. To implement this, 2 possibles scenarios: S1 : invoke →Num (or ASN) two times in a row with the expression values as a first result and the logical value after the second time. OR an interesting possibility S2: A first call shows a tagged result of the form 'AA+BB<C*C'ˍ?:True and the second call to →Num (or ASN) would simply remove the tag from any object of the form 'express'ˍ?:Log_Val to finally leave on the stack the logical value alone.
(May be, if →Num and ASN are distinct operation, ASN would give directly the logical value). Remark about S2: it may seem strange to use the notation ˍ? as if it was a unit but wouldn't it possible to consider some kind of a logical unit because if express1 and express2 are themselves logical expression (e.g. A>B, C=3) then for instance 'A>B AND C=3'ˍ? would act as an alternate logical operation with a definitive answer. Is it an interesting suggestion ? I wonder ...
When evaluating an equation like
'A*A+B*B=C*C'
with→Num
, we get aTrue
orFalse
result. Would it be preferable to see the left and right results?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: