Doesn't install with rails 3.0.4

[brodock]

Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "activesupport":
In Gemfile:
rails (= 3.0.4) depends on
activesupport (= 3.0.4)

pox_paginate (~> 0.2.1) depends on
  activesupport (3.0.3)

[kaiwren]

Could you try that with
gem 'pox_paginate', '> 0.2.2'
instead of
gem 'pox_paginate', '> 0.2.1'

0.2.2 is set up to work with all Rails 3.0.x. Let me know if that fixes it for you.

[brodock]

This seens to work... but pox looks like not working correctly.

I've started to debug it and it looks likes total_pages is not retrived correctly

While trying to see a normal "index crud" page, that has a <%= will_paginate @noticias %> I get:

undefined method `<' for nil:NilClass

Looking at the stacktrace I get:

activesupport (3.0.4) lib/active_support/whiny_nil.rb:48:in `method_missing'
/Users/brodock/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/bundler/gems/will_paginate-b1a5beeec9f5/lib/will_paginate/view_helpers/base.rb:110:in `page_entries_info'
/Users/brodock/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/bundler/gems/will_paginate-b1a5beeec9f5/lib/will_paginate/view_helpers/action_view.rb:40:in `page_entries_info'
app/views/noticias/index.html.erb:26:in `_app_views_noticias_index_html_erb___634210951152283626_2162848200__128685990689779746'
...

Which leads to the total_pages from will_paginate collection being returned as a NilClass

Any idea?

I tried with Will_Paginate 3.0pre2, 3.0beta and git version using rails3 branch. None of them worked.

I'm also using InheritedResource, and adapted the instructions to work fine with it:

class NoticiasController < InheritedResources::Base
  protected
    def collection
      @noticias ||= end_of_association_chain.paginate(:page => params[:page], :per_page => params[:per_page])
    end
end

[preethiramdev]

I created a sample application and on looking at the "index crud page" I find that the "total entries" returned matches up with the total number of entities created . So it would seem that pox is working fine. You can look at my sample app at
git://gist.github.com/858431.git and perhaps give me more details so I can understand if I have replicated the bug correctly?