You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The fee calculation (also for Babbage transactions) changed in Conway era / protocol version 9 to include costs proportional to reference script size. Our internal wallet seems to not incorporate that or is slightly off.
Weirdly, this was not captured by our end-to-end test that opens a head in babbage, forks into conway and closes a head again?
Could be related to the cost model; does that change when the eras are forked in our tests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context & versions
Hydra commit 209de1d, but any version should have this issue.
Trying to close the head we had open on
preview
, opened inBabbage
and now to close inConway
.Steps to reproduce
Babbage
Conway
Actual behavior
Failed to post tx:
2024-08-01.18-45-24.mp4
Expected behavior
Hypothesis
The fee calculation (also for Babbage transactions) changed in Conway era / protocol version 9 to include costs proportional to reference script size. Our internal wallet seems to not incorporate that or is slightly off.
Weirdly, this was not captured by our end-to-end test that opens a head in babbage, forks into conway and closes a head again?
Could be related to the cost model; does that change when the eras are forked in our tests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: