You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The formalism used in the paper is not capturing well the nature of on-chain verification within Cardano. For example, validators do not produce values, but merely check existing ones. Hence, the Hydra researchers are drafting up new specification in a slightly different formalism to more faithfully capture the checks to be done on-chain.
@KtorZ@ffakenz I would say this subtask of #448 can be called done as we have a first draft of the on-chain spec + above list of currently identified gaps, which we also collect in the overall follow-up story #452
Why
The formalism used in the paper is not capturing well the nature of on-chain verification within Cardano. For example, validators do not produce values, but merely check existing ones. Hence, the Hydra researchers are drafting up new specification in a slightly different formalism to more faithfully capture the checks to be done on-chain.
What
As they have created a first draft here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LlTTUuHu-3d-krq-O1h59kHm93Kb4cCQ6GhOcodFys/edit#), we now have a set of meetings to walk through both, the formalism and the actual specification, and review it together with them. This story captures the work on these sessions and the outcome being
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: