-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Name can be confusing #76
Comments
Hey, name changes do carry a certain risk, but I can understand your point. Suggestions? |
renderUnit – "render" as it can be used for rendering components (i.e. Although render has connotations of CGI it's also used frequently for the On 13 January 2016 at 12:53, Christoph Burgmer [email protected]
|
Hmm, I'd like to have the name directly relate to "testing" (yes, csscritic does a bad job at that :) I agree that we test more than CSS, actually HTML, JS and other assets. Also, you might want to use csscritic to just supervise screenshots you have obtained differently (I was trying to get my last team to test the PDFs that otherwise directly went to production without any automated test). |
UsageWhen I started to use it I stop to consider which location and name would be the more meaningful for team-mate that would work on the project.
SuggestionsReading you I was thinking to the following names:
RenamingGithub do transparent redirect when you rename your repo. Question
|
visual-regression. yes! That's exactly how I described it in our department Something like "Visual Regression Tester" would work. On 13 January 2016 at 14:32, Édouard Lopez [email protected] wrote:
|
I think the terms you are listing are a very good match to what it does. I'd love to see this somewhat in the name. For me a name is more than that though. Something that sticks when you read an article, when you talk about it, something you can relate to personally. And also something that differentiates itself from other similar tools.
Thanks for the hint, that will help for sure.
My last project was generating PDFs with mock data for manual review (that may or may not happen). Given more time I would have
|
Seeing this comment reminded me of a discussion I had with my my manager where I had to explain what CSSCritic was (after talking about it to him previously) because he'd assumed it was a critiquing / linting tool (i.e. something like Parker).
Would you consider renaming csscritic to something that better represents what it is used for?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: