Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should there be a UnmarshalCedar receiver? #44

Open
mqf20 opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should there be a UnmarshalCedar receiver? #44

mqf20 opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mqf20
Copy link

mqf20 commented Oct 1, 2024

For example, there is a func (v EntityUID) MarshalCedar() []byte receiver:

MarshalCedar produces a valid MarshalCedar language representation of the EntityUID, e.g. Type::"id".

Should there also be a func (v *EntityUID) UnmarshalCedar(b []byte) error receiver?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant